As a player in the AI industry, we are firm believers in the value it can deliver — when integrated correctly into analytics pipelines at insurance firms.
You can't trust chatbots to generate reliable predictions. But you can leverage generative AI to make large, complex, and intricate legal documents accessible to purpose-built predictive algorithms. That's exactly what we do.
And the value goes beyond a rough estimate of possible damages. We've built mathematical modeling into the entire dispute-prediction pipeline, so every prediction ships with a calibrated error measurement — not just a single number, but a set of analytics you can reason with.
This makes Canotera a building block in the decision chain at every stage: when taking on a case, throughout its evolving life cycle, and all the way to closure.
Related articles.
Can You Trust LLMs to Predict the Outcome of an Insurance Claim?
Language models generate verbal predictions that sound sensible — but they were trained to sound logical, not to be mathematically sound.
Why Comparable Verdicts Overstate Settlement Exposure
Public trial verdicts are terrible predictors of settlement value. The data is systematically biased toward extreme disagreement, leading models and adjusters alike to radically over-reserve.
When AI Should Say It Doesn't Know
Language models are built to generate plausible text, not calculate risk. When an AI offers a single dollar figure for a complex claim without quantifying its own doubt, it is not predicting. It is guessing.
Want to talk to an executive?
Press, partners, investors, candidates — the inbox is monitored. Tell us who you are and we'll route it to the right person within two business days.